(Depending on screen size, the formatting might get broken up here and there.)
.
A Glimpse Through the Fiction
.
“The greatest weapon is the control of information.”
– Unknown
.
“We live on an island surrounded by a sea of ignorance. As our
island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.”
– John Archibald Wheeler
.
“Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.”
– Albert Einstein
.
One of the symptoms of mind control is that the subjects do not realize they are under mind control. The most common description of the universe might begin with familiar things such as cities, forests, people, animals, the sky, ocean, stars. Some individuals are inclined to begin with vast, cosmic scales; others with microscopic scales. Most answers for the question of “what is real?” are unequally apparent but are equally valid. It is also all based upon a pinprick of conscious observation. In the 1800s it was suspected and soon confirmed that there were basic and omnipresent building blocks of all matter. Experiments with passing alpha radiation through gold foil were done in the early 1900s that measured the structure and amount of empty space in the atom. The results showing a number in excess of 99.9999999999999% (by diameter the nucleus is tens-of-thousands of times smaller and by volume about one-quadrillion) shocked many physicists at the time, but many were also expecting it. Even the part seemingly filled is the result of a force concentration that is the nucleus. As the next century unfolded, extreme advancements were made in mapping the nature of existence at its most essential. With the evolvement of quantum mechanics and later quantum field theory, a great difference also evolved in interpretations over the same data. Some of the most ground-breaking researchers have said there is understanding but not complete understanding. There is wide agreement on the presence of data but not always on what it means.
.
From the five percent of atomic constituents, the rest remaining dark, we get the known universe that includes ourselves. The structure of the atom that we all first learn about starts with the electrons (or electron “cloud” to be more accurate), surrounding a tiny nucleus. The nucleus is composed of the particles protons and neutrons, which internally are made of still smaller units of measurement. The explanation becomes long and technical as most educators lay out the process of how matter takes form into the everyday world. For the majority of the population, it is just a dull topic that they touch on during high school and then never think about again. It seems meaningless to the actual course of their daily lives, which is the predictable impression.
.
The heart of it gets lost among the technicalities. Through all of the mechanical words and numbers, there is another thread that’s ever-present but simultaneously obscured. The world of solidity and weight, of time and definition, of the five senses; that world is not summed up by appearance. Its deeper levels are described in the terms of energies and forces–nuclear, kinetic, electrical and on. To such terms as these, every expression of physical being, motion, substance, touch, sound, sight, everything that goes on in the surface reality is traceable. Further, the very particles that make up the solid world will show the form of waves as their deep nature in experiments. No one knows exactly what those waves are, only that they do occur. A wave function and equation can describe what the recognized particles will do but not what really is the wave. We see an object in our familiar three-dimensional universe take one path, such as a rolling ball; but both the object’s paths in the wave and dimensions of the abstract Hilbert space in which it exists are infinite. It is not an object but a state of probabilities about its existence.
.
In the traditional presentation, it is still asserted that the everyday matter we see and states of the energy, information or of whatever it may be composed, are identically interchangeable even at the subnuclear depth and that the world takes this form independent of how aware or unaware anyone may be. The formation would have nothing to do with the abstract term of consciousness, or the conditioning of consciousness, individually or collectively. The same message is disguised and pushed throughout most every detail of normal education, media and any reachable direction of influence: There is no more to perceive than this, so accept it and get on with serving it. When a situation develops gradually and in careful increments, the magnitude of it can go unnoticed even though it’s in plain sight all the time. We now have the global consensus of a reality that allows the wealthiest fraction to have more power than all the
rest combined. We have a reality that allows for enormous pyramid structures in economics where deceit and corruption at the top are so commonplace that it is expected and accepted. The broad transfer from the many up to the few is snowballing faster and faster. In not much time at the same rate, there could be single bloodlines controlling multi-trillion dollars. A far smaller fraction than one percent would go on to virtually erase all wealth outside their own. Looking ahead, the groundwork laid now for a whole new kind of totalitarianism will be completed if the momentum continues. This world is the result of a base manipulation large and complex enough to achieve inconceivability to most beneath its power. For the small percentage able to see through enough to get the whole picture, they see a critical tipping point for the future of humanity. Opposite the state of growing imbalance, there is potential for a change beyond the wildest of hopes.
.
The puzzle needs a wide spectrum of pieces to figure out why we find ourselves in this kind of a world. There has long been overwhelming evidence that our consensus reality is just a model made of highly edited information at the neurological level. The model can be arbitrarily changed through surgical, electrical, natural evolution and any number of redirections. Humans access only a tiny portion of all that’s available while being purposely focused towards acceptance and service to it. The grasp of how much could go beyond the proverbial experience goes hand in hand with facing that there’s more to consciousness than is explainable. Any branch of science asks that the predictions of a theory must match with observation, and by that, areas such as cosmic evolution and then planetary biology/evolution can provide an answer. Another question still remains in a grey area, however, about why a human observation should be assumed the correct one. The reality is just as real for those born with synesthesia or without eyesight as the one is real to those in greater numbers with so-called normal senses. On everyone there is in fact a small blind spot where the optic nerve attaches, which has to be compensated for during cerebral image-processing. If almost everyone was born with the nerve detached and as a majority we never knew we were missing anything or if everyone was born with synesthesia, then science would have to match with a universe known by the most common experience. To scientifically verify a reason why any experience is the definitive one means a circle back to the initial question.
.
The body is an accumulation of atoms in the same energy-matter equivalence including the brain tissue itself all the way down to its billions of neuron cells. All known matter in the universe can be reduced to only electrons and quarks (and the more exotic neutrino). Most of that is found in stars in the plasma state, but the same electrons and quarks are at the foundation as anywhere else. Our everyday concept of a live or dead organism only occurs at the surface. Appearances are deceiving, but as in the laws of thermodynamics, energy can only be transferred and altered. However alien and extreme the relocation or change may seem, it isn’t a complete start or stop. A person is not really their body or individual organs or the impression of solid particles beginning at the molecular and even atomic levels. The brain too is just a housing like that of a computer housing. Within the electrical impulses between the synapses of neurons is the flow of thought, memory encoding, perception, all at work experiencing them as a macrolevel sensory-based reality. The body around the mind, the planet around the body, the universe around the planet, all hinge upon the distinct impression of senses that take place in those impulses. The external sense organs such as the eyes and skin are part of the perceived body as a vehicle to experience the perceived environment. That does not mean it is unreal or invalid, but there is a broader story to how resolutions are made about certainty.
.
Einstein was one of the founders of quantum mechanics, but later in life he became disturbed by some of the findings that were made and the fact that they were provable. It was in serious conflict with his earlier theories of relativity and far more perplexing. He had already showed how matter warps and curves space, that space and time are flexible and relative to who is observing. If you walk by someone, for instance, they might say you’re moving at two miles per hour. Another watching from orbit would say you were moving a thousand mph with the planet’s rotation; watching from farther away, sixty-thousand as the planet orbits the sun; from the edge of the galaxy, five-hundred-thousand as the sun orbits it; from still farther, millions of mph as the galaxy moves. Yet the speed of light will be measured the same for any observer and results in clocks, even biological clocks, ticking faster or slower depending on each other’s speed differences. Special and general relativity were breakthroughs and can eloquently describe everything that goes on at the scales that include gravitation, our lives and the rest of the familiar universe. At the scale of the building blocks behind all of that, however, everything familiar shatters.
.
The famous double-slit experiments are the essence of bizarre and amazing. Particles are shown to behave both as classical point-particles and as waves (and eventually came the theory of them as parts of single, underlying fields). When one particle at a time is sent toward two openings and the results are found on a screen afterward, wave interference patterns result, like what can be seen over the surface of water when multiple ripples meet. While watched by a detector, particles remain whole, take straight paths and produce non-wave patterns. The paths that the wave-producing particles took seemed to be of enormous complexity and number. Done with up to large molecules, the differences of form and paths taken is in wild contrast to the behavior of matter in the everyday world. Quantum behavior is a valid way of describing that world, however, because it is the building blocks without which there is no bigger picture to put together. There are also no carved-in-stone lines as to where one level ends and another begins; rather than divided levels, there is a seamless connectivity. It has long been known that atoms do not have well-defined boundaries. With the development of the electron microscope now capable of clear images of molecules and atoms, they appear to an observer as defined entities from the outside looking in.
.
The paradox is that while it can be interpreted from those experiments that wave-particle duality should be, the phase where particles are not exact points but in a distributed wave cannot be tracked in live progress. The detectors are sometimes cited as collapsing the wave just by firing photons to tell which paths were taken. Yet the apparent collapse also occurs from measurements that don’t involve contact and are only information-based. Early quantum theorists demonstrated how probability amplitudes can be calculated and the outcome of a series of particles predicted. Because of that and other factors, quantum application into physics became the most accurate and revolutionary of all time. But as for what is really happening in the state of a wave, that is still undefined by absolutes. A probability distribution is one way to say it. A principle involved is that particles cannot be at a definite point during that phase and have at least a slight chance of being anywhere and everywhere, including the other
side of the universe.
.
The tests have been run in astonishing variations where detection is delayed, which in practice allows a single particle to form into a wave and go through both slits to start producing those patterns. Then just before reaching the screen, the detection is
made, and the results on the screen end up as the non-wave pattern. What this appears to mean is that when a detection begins, the decision of the wave goes back in time to before reaching the slits. There it reverts to the original particle and goes straight through only one slit on an expected path, as matter would normally behave. As if it
were the future, the past seems to have taken no definite path until we’ve located the building blocks of matter at a definite spot, and in between our locations it takes all paths simultaneously. A word for that is superposition. Another paradox is that it does seem the detector could effect the direction of the particle but not its very nature. There have been variations with a particle pair sent toward split setups and the results change after having already reached the screen. The detection can be left on for only one of the pair and record, but if the which-path information is erased before being seen, the results on the screen show a wave for the other. If the record is not erased and then seen, the results show the non-wave. You could also place a recorder at one slit, fire a single particle toward the other slit and get a particle; if the recorder didn’t go off, then you know it had to have gone thru the other slit. Then remove the recorder altogether, fire another particle and get a wave thru both, since no information of any kind exists about the path. Of course this side of science is very open to interpretation, but the old question remains of whether our presence in the taking of a measurement has the effect, due to a sense of perception that expects relatable behavior. Predictions can be made that match with measurements, though, and that is all the practical outlook requires. There is no unequivocal way yet, with which every last physicist agrees, to settle on what it all means beyond that; they tend to see the reason for the results quite differently. There are plans to do the test later with a virus, which could be considered a microorganism.
.
There is even a concept for the test where the light from a quasar, billions of light years from Earth, could be turned into a double-slit setup by gravitational lensing of a galaxy in between. If collected enough here, those photons should produce the very same interference patterns. Then, if information were acquired to tell which paths were taken, the pattern would disappear. The behavior of how waves have seemed to communicate to the original starting point in time, to act as normal particles, has a far more mind-blowing implication now. It suggests that the choice of paths by the quasar photons could go back billions of years. To a time perhaps before this planet, our sun and some stars in our sky had even developed yet. And the quasar may not even exist today since we are getting the light as it was billions of years ago. If giant particles like the molecules and virus could have somehow been sent with the quasar photons, they should do the same choice retraction through time as any other particle. These unfathomable acts would be caused by our detection. Remove the detection and the wave pattern returns.
.
The true state underlying matter is still unknown. It still leaves enormous questions about time and what is really going on between us and the fundamentals to what is called reality. With the 0.0000000000001% or so from the atomic nucleus that
would seem filled, its nature is like a small, powerful version of the overall atom, in terms of energy and force causing a deflective field of tension. With many atoms together in our hand and in an object, we can touch the object and it seems solid, or we can stand upon the planet and not fall through it. But the quality beneath that effect is polar opposite from the macroscopic physics that overwhelm how we’re taught. The
fundamentals are more like that of a hologram during transmission or encoded data stream. The five-sense kind of physical and matter that edges into the experience of gravity, and the familiar universe that moves by it, is one given version from a spectrum of what could be.
.
Exposure to considerations outside the box should be a major part of everyone’s early, formative knowledge, but instead is severely lacking in tradition. Virtually all of an atom’s mass derives from energies of the binding nuclear force, which is tremendously stronger than gravity, that holds the nucleus together and kinetic energy of the quarks (the rest derives from the Higgs energy that is thought to permeate the universe). There is no substance involved as we think of it in our normal lives. Abstract states with obviously undiscovered potentials are also fully documented and acknowledged. From an infantile age most people are trained about reality in ways, though, that lead to hardwiring of a distorted perception. They are led to think that reality is objective and based on everyday concrete. They are set up for a trajectory through the system that has choices but only within the narrow parameters it sets forth, and most young minds never realize how narrow that is or that a programmed set even exists. There is nothing inherent in the raw data before it gets processed by the brain as a version of reality, and that version is not definitive. With visible light our processor only accesses a tiny band of wavelength and frequency out of a range that is endless by comparison and the same
fractional intake applies to all the senses. The amount we get is almost nonexistent, and the amount actually recognized from that is again almost none, out of all the sensations present from the subconscious every moment. Like a photo with ten million pixels
disintegrated down to a handful of scattered dots, the brain fills in the rest with what it has been taught to believe should be there. Such pictures are called models–the impression of a complete, external environment built around stray fragments and not a true mirror of what’s out there. The fabric of reality seems concrete and with limits because it is interpreted that way, but rather than express to people how much could be beyond the tiny ranges of that interpretation, they are directed to focus on it and disregard all other possibility. The baseline of what
can and cannot be experienced is founded early and fast becomes irreversible.
.
String theories have used both quantum mechanics and relativity together, taking into account that matter seems to behave as both particle and wave, and the search for why gravity is so much weaker than the electromagnetic and nuclear forces. Cosmologists could use only relativity to reverse the expansion of galaxies, which are moving away faster in proportion to distance, for the notion of a compact unity amidst a “big bang.” The newer formulas paint the event in a much different light than that of an explosion at a certain point in space. The nature is of quantum effects where every possible path is taken in a continual process of ten or more dimensions, including time itself, folded together in a large degree of ways into other types of universes. Their number is so big that the number of atoms that may be in this universe is incredibly less, and each type may also repeat over and over thru eternal inflation. To help visualize how the enfoldments could happen, think of a thick piece of paper with height, width and a bit of depth, then rolled up tightly and viewed from far enough back to appear as a one-dimensional line. This universe would be a pattern of vibration among stratums of others. In this particular arrangement of dimensions, these particular laws of physics would arise, then our eventual concepts about their nature. Involving multidimensional interactions, gravity might be a leakage from strings (the word string shouldn’t be taken too literally but to signify a vibrational quality) connected across others. The combination of string theories is so far regarded as the broadest stroke of explanation to cover every facet of the micro and macro realms. There are plentiful other theories as well, both that partly agree and that diverge altogether. There are more than could be studied and fully understood in a lifetime.
.
There is an element that so often seems overlooked, or considered far less vital when it could be considered the most vital. Theorized scenarios can sync astonishingly well with the same reality being experienced and if precise enough are called answers. But that precise experience is still taking place not out in a construct of distance and substance but in the informed impulses that are read and translated as that construct. The Hubble telescope has recorded images of ancient galaxies over thirteen billion light years away; but the space, time and solidity in the dynamics of that observation are conceived the same way as that of a room, a body, even the organ of the eye that looks upon the images. There is
a reflex action blanketing most areas of study to assume that humans are grasping the reality and not just a version. Research is concentrated on the what of that version by obsessing over appearance, rather than the why and how that we think it is there in the first place.
.
The answer to this reality may not precisely be that it is virtual, but the way it works is comparable. Anything that processes and provides information can be seen as a computer; that includes black holes, basic calculators, and of course neural
communication and reading of signals. Those high in the system instinctively understand how it works and how to guide the masses into thinking the near-zero reach of their data processing is the whole of the story. Then apparent, materialistic progress can seem like all that matters. Yet the ability to refine choices and put most of them into a competitive, kill-or-be-killed approach to jobs and conduct has led straight to a faster transfer of wealth from the working masses to the very few who make the rule set. The reasons for how the percentage gap has grown that way can all be put into the same context of a game that’s rigged.
.
Now in early development, quantum computers should be the next technological leap. They might someday eclipse the brain, which is still inexplicably more advanced than any supercomputer today but has the same essential theme by
receiving raw data and synthesizing it into an experience. Some physicists have said that aside of nuclear and subnuclear particles given symbolic names such as color and spin, the only properties they really have are of numbers. Some have noted patterns in equations with repeated 1s and 0s like the executable coding for what kind of activity will result on a monitor. That doesn’t automatically mean anything but is motive to look beyond assumptions at the surface. It has already long been shown by science
that the impression of substance is produced by the force of interacting electric fields. In the model our brain uses, things do seem solid and divided but that is not the case at a much deeper look. Electricity itself is still a phenomenon without complete understanding, especially that biologically produced which encodes and retrieves memories, but a current is carried by atoms called ions or by loosely-bound electrons moving from one atom to another.
.
The mystery of consciousness goes deeper than even the most infinitesimal of manifestation. Influences from the system apply to the general population, so anything that deviates from that consensus is called speculative. It is just as speculative to feel certain that all the system’s influences are set up without its own interest put first. Organized, labeled belief structures are spread throughout humanity. While there are many different types, they accomplish the same effect by keeping their followers grounded in a state where they have to, at least in some degree, participate in and support the system. The system is less concerned with exactly which beliefs are followed, just as long as some are because of the general effect it has on focus.
Hydrocephalus is a medical condition when fluid can get trapped inside the cranium and hinder the brain from growing. With infants it can sometimes be treated but can cause severe mental impairment or death. Then there have been a handful of individuals who reached adulthood before it being discovered how they didn’t develop. They had a quarter or even much less of a normal brain intact, but they were fully conscious and in some cases had average intelligence. A very remarkable case was of a mathematics student at a university in the United Kingdom who was found to have, at most, ten percent of a brain but had an IQ of 126. There are a great amount of different outlooks upon such exotic things. The main lesson to take away is that no specialty has immovable answers for everything else.
.
The gulf is clear between how the smaller building blocks appear as a wave-particle duality, then how the building blocks encountered in everyday life are accumulations of the former but do not show us that quality. The superposition of the wave function
is often said to automatically diminish, or have decoherence, related with size and loss of information into the surroundings; but no absolute lines can be drawn between what is small and what is large. In a well-known experiment about fifteen years ago, molecules of 60 atoms showed the interference pattern in the double-slit. In later years it was done with bigger molecules and recently achieved with molecules of 810
atoms (about 15,000 total protons, neutrons and electrons). To keep isolating larger amounts to where the surrounding environment’s atoms won’t cause decoherence, the question arises of how many start to qualify as an environment. If lines for a cutoff of quantum behavior were claimed to be, then the exact point of accumulated atoms, with one more added on to cause a key difference, encounters another thought. Within that
particular atom, its nature like all others is a spectrum of possibilities except while being measured/experienced as single possibility. The process of adding one more atom at a
time could continue all the way to our cosmological horizons without a certain number ever truly mattering beyond generalization. From the assembly of molecules that is the body, if each of them could be dissected and effectively isolated, the sum of our
entire makeup could be altered to wave distributions. Whether that state is viewed as figurative potential or any other notion, perhaps a more genuine wording than to alter manifestations to another nature is to reveal their true nature.
.
While small scales can have entanglement, the status of large scales is also entangled with quantum events as underlined by the early Shrodinger thought experiment, for a profound example. (If the life of a hypothetical animal is tied to the outcome of a particle with a fifty-percent chance of radioactive decay, the animal must be both dead and alive at the same time until someone checks it; this principle helped lead to the many-worlds interpretation where there is no wave function collapse and the other outcome continues on in a parallel universe.) An act of making a measurement can be anything that involves the five senses, alone or in combination, and which interprets a probability wave to resolve itself into a particular outcome in this reality. A machine–or even a single particle–can also make a measurement, have the same decoherring effect and then supply us sensory data to interpret. Sight and all of the senses happen at the neural level and are not a mirror of what’s truly there. So it must be remembered that even the particles that make up the machine, the brain matter itself and everything else we see and know are perceptual models, irrespective of their accuracy or validity which can be debated.
.
Where it becomes challenging to explain, and needs a very open approach, is how the quantum events of neural signals and processing are where a measurement really happens–and if the act of causing a probability wave to resolve can be described by a
sensory observation, in this case they are both one in the same. There is a sharp divide in view about whether the expectation that things will be in a certain form is the only condition that makes them so. In other words “creating reality” as you look at it. But there is another way of exploring the sides of that question besides a pure yes or no, either of which haven’t changed the situation. Expectation is part of being aware, but there would be no preconceived limit if consciousness was likely more than a specific amount in generation by macroscopic matter or even what is called the mind, still having identity with the feel of division. And crucially: if consciousness was also likely more than an intended form sourced from some separate source, but one that is the unnaturally influenced version of one that is intrinsic and unlimited in its natural state.
.
The concept of clinical death is when breathing and blood flow have stopped. Measurable brain activity ceases within a minute afterward. A variety of scans are required to confirm all absence though, and the circumstances where that would be done are not in emergency situations, so there is a lack of documentation on when that has fully occurred. Certain rare surgeries require an induction called hypothermic circulatory arrest where the use of low temperature can extend the time of clinical death and brain inactivity up to thirty minutes. Under normal conditions, damage starts at around five minutes. The quantity of time isn’t important next to the difference of whether experiences occur during the period of inactivity or right before and after. The
out-of-body experiences that some of those individuals have are typically criticized by psychologists and neuroscientists. One can say it may be a drastic malfunction. One can say it may be a hyper imagining where REM dreams can overlap with wakefulness right
before or after resuscitation. One can say that a surge of endorphins or dimethyltryptamine may release in the timeframe surrounding death, and it may be the flashback of a memory. There are more explanations that can be suggested, but whether they are right is still largely unknown. While agreeing that all instances of electrical activity are forms of energy–which can only move and alter, despite how relocation might appear as destruction–many scientific thinkers are prone to still be dismissive. Meet the rare people who happened to be scientists and then had their own such experience firsthand, however, and they have a different perspective. They can come from the same educational background and area of expertise, but the connection across many diverse areas, such as linking neuroscience and biology to quantum mechanics and others, is understandably hard to grasp without firsthand experience.
.
With it, a case can instantly be seen that consciousness has no absolutes attached and that it is without boundaries or an age. The individual brain/mind could act as a filter and
could be like merely a pinpoint in the middle of an infinite ocean. When focus is shifted from the pinpoint to a greater focus, the measure of awareness has to begin expanding in turn. Those who’ve been able to glimpse that and then were pulled back to focus on the
pinpoint will often say no words can capture it, but it is a state of peace where time and separation are transparently more scales of appearance. The relentlessness of appearance is vital to keeping focus on a pinpoint state of consciousness while there is such immensity all around it. The idea that consciousness is solely the limited result of brain matter, book-ended by a start date and a stop date, is shortsighted when that same matter derives from abstract fundamentals experienced by a heavily influenced orientation.
.
With reality even taken at face-value, there is another grey area about any true size relevance. Talking of an atom as a small unit of measurement seems to make sense; they can be billions of times smaller than the smallest dot visible to the eye. Talking of a galaxy like the Milky Way which is a hundred-thousand light years across as a large measurement seems to make sense. But either estimation is just subjectively based on what’s relative to our own size. If the perspective were altered by enough, an atom could appear large or a galaxy small. From only a few minutes away at light speed, the Earth is no longer visible. The size of the observable universe has been estimated at about ninety billion light years, but it is also expanding much faster than light and into nothing definable, which is where it seemed to have come from. There are relations between the face-value of starts and stops, and a state where space, events and
time are all happening in one continuous moment. The very small, be that a proton or a person or a planet, should not seem inconsequential because the very large only appears large due to subjectivity.
.
Any sized picture can always be zoomed out from the profusion of details to another picture that swallows the first and becomes part of a new pattern. The publicized search for other life in the galaxy is always centered around something a human can relate to in various terms, but where there is movement, there is not death. There is movement everywhere in the universe throughout all sized pictures. We just cannot easily relate to
that as a form of life. The atoms of the cells that compose a small organism are the same atoms that pass through nebula and stars and supernovas and planets. Elements such as hydrogen and carbon that make up a small organism are in about the same ratios
spread throughout the universe. A galaxy in motion from far enough away even resembles a cell, the billions of stars thick like the clumping of molecules that can make it appear solid at a distance. At the scale of superclusters where billions upon billions of galaxies are distributed through the universe, there are structures that do resemble imagery of the neural network in high detail. These operate very differently, but the laws of physics themselves are something we’ve documented from within the consensus model that we most commonly share and to which they are matching. Just being the most common model does not make it the correct or only version. There’s no end to new perspectives on the face-value reality. It should not be said that every last aspect of that version is muted somehow, but what’s extremely questionable is that we’re taking in all there is and that it’s a singular version.
.
When meaning this physical existence and the universe at large, it really means whatever the electrical action between neurons gauge about an ultimately abstract nature from tiny ranges of experience. The quick response might be that there’s no other choice but to judge by what does seem real, in spite of any unknown. Sensory input and trust is just one facet of a much broader suppression though. It all traces back to how much consciousness we seem to have and the constant reassurance that that’s all there is to have. With unrestricted access would be no walls between the individual and the surroundings into which they’re sending intentions, because it is them and vice
versa. Beings with such an awareness would be impossible to control. They have to be kept to an adjusted amount of access, and the reality model it induces has to be relentless and consistent to be believable. With the belief in such an overpowering rule as time, they can then be convinced of a history of humanity that solidifies this impression of real and make it seem unquestionable. The key to getting the mind to believe in its programming is to first think there is no program, that everything is natural and straightforward. From there on, it is easy to instill a sense of urgency about limited time to succeed and pressure from the system to join it.
.
They only need to condition how perception takes place, and then what will be perceived largely takes care of itself. The right conditions are set by tapping into subliminal processes, through repetition of the desired outlook on what is going on and distraction
away from what is really going on. The frontline of objectives is to make the biggest businesses in the world seem as if they are anything except businesses. At the top of the pyramid, the real puppet-masters of mankind seldom enter the public eye but hand
down the root protocol about what will go on in education and economic schema. The base of the condition starts early from those older who’ve already been through it and are unknowingly passing it on. With the right tendency started, the mountain of deep
programming to come later can be accepted with relative ease. In the most elaborate and ingenious form of slavery, some still may realize they are enslaved but feel there is no option except to participate or else not survive. A frequent tactic is to make the simple sound complex. The banking system is a conglomerate where every financial funnel is really part of one behind different masks. The terminology used in banking and stock market scams is complex but the actual acts of thievery are not.
.
Another tactic is to give the impression that the public is being done a favor–as in, we are protecting you by war, not just out to make billions from manufacturing, seizing resources and the other financial incentives for the rich that a war present. Misdirection is encouraged thru television and much of the entertainment industry to maintain passiveness to the program and the will to continue on. Employment is endorsed as a benign arrangement, but all jobs out in the public arena are part of a subtle web that reaches every last corner and takes more away than it gives. Then all of what’s pooled
from the masses is funneled up to the same small group at the top. It is constantly insinuated that no such exploitation exists. Another key is to present a business venture as if it is the answer to a problem that must be dealt with, when the problem was probably engineered in the first place by the same powers now using it as a cover story for their interests. The top of the pyramid views the bottom as nothing more than livestock and wants them to feed, work, contribute to the upwards funnel, then die. It is a horrific analogy but it is accurate. Those at the top have a sense of entitlement and that
they are better because of the extravagant power, no matter how inhumanly it was acquired.
.
Not only is such corruption allowed to flourish but is legal in astounding blatancy. The network of those powerful enough to influence the laws that allow it are the same ones doing it. The exponential rate of the gap grown between the haves and have-nots isn’t noticeable at a glance, but in trendlines over long periods it is startling. Everyone hears about the one percent but the main figure is more like the top one percent of the one percent. Imagine a chess game with ten-thousand players on the surface of the board.
The top hundred of them might share a split of 35% control and all the others thousands share a split of 14%. At ground level it is a very chaotic mess that seems random in the details. But then there is another single player above, looking down on the board, with the other
51% control. It doesn’t really matter what those on the surface do or how much they think they are playing their own game, because the player above can overrule and direct the game as a whole.
.
The thought-programming agenda creates blindness to smaller scams throughout society all layered within one big scam that is the shape of the upward funnel. For the process to run smoothly, they need servants that are intellectually robotic, not creative but good at taking in instruction and repeating it over and over. Intellect is not the same as insight. Even when someone can see that they are a gear in a machine, it seems there is no way out since any involvement involves motion of the machine’s wretched oil known as money. The majority cannot see it enough and accept whatever story the government/media has told them. Violence and injustice throughout society are just side effects of the kind of world that allows a handful at the top to have all the control; if the world wasn’t that way, then they wouldn’t be able to hold such a position. The number of the elite is small, and could easily be resisted, but they have a psychological spell cast over the masses to be submissive. Their power is really just an intoxicating veil that
allows plans to be carried out in plain sight. Their greatest strength is the people’s inability to read between the lines.
.
As hopelessly conditioned as society can seem, the encouraging part is that the whole earthly con just stems from the forced attention onto things that seem to be. Expansion of the focus equals destruction of the lie; but it would have to be a simultaneous, global shift of awareness on an evolutionary scale. Certain individuals can get free when they have enough will to break loose the conditioning. The general population does not have that will due to many preventive blockages embedded. In some deep way, they still may know but would rather not have to deal with it and just go on pretending. Blankets of the population appear so far gone into the program that they are walking embodiments of it. The rigged game has little concern over some strays that have broken free, as long as
the majority is still there and can be used like batteries. Anyone who tries to question mainstream truths is usually mocked and ignored. That reaction is purposely indoctrinated to defend the program against challenge.
.
There are miraculous notions of what could be if such a worldwide awakening were to happen. There are terrifying notions of what will happen if it does not. AI and the transhumanism movement–blending the body with technology–are already in development. These could be used for good but not if the current power structure has control. To jump to a scene of the distant future, the seed that’s planted now could have mutated into a place where not only has the top of the pyramid scourged the rest, but what’s below is a wasteland of identically-thinking drone workers where there is no longer any need for media and other brainwashing tactics; the condition those tactics are meant for is inbuilt. There have been findings for some time in animal experimentation that the nervous system can be overridden and input duplicated through precision electrodes implanted in their brains.
.
That scene of the future sounds like a deformity but it is just a magnified stage of what’s happening now. And it is far from the most extreme examples into what the seed of today could grow. The turn of the tide for a wholly better scene is just as likely
though, and would come from the realization that all the answers are already staring us back from the mirror. The event horizon we will cross towards a super-advanced AI may represent something very different than most think. A true evolutionary leap would go beyond the surface illusions of cells and tissue having a disconnect from the particles that make up any other material, organic or inorganic, and reach what they are deeper still as the abstract entities of fields or something comparable. With an evolution focused at the foundational level far from surface expressions, a new post-human era of massive potential could be set free, potential that is already here now but we’ve just not pieced together yet.
.
Reflecting on what exactly the truth of particles could be, it can be implied that the state of a wave is a figurative representation of all possibility. There are mathematical sums that try to capture that statement. The non-collapse wave function of the many-worlds take is either infinite or into many googolplexes of parallel universes. The most recognizable from string theory is a one followed by five-hundred zeros or 10^500–the number of all the grains of sand on Earth’s beaches and deserts times itself about twenty times over. Compare the atoms in our observable universe at 10^80 to the other dimensional possibilities as likely as this one but which could have unimaginable differences. The necessity for such titanic equations starts with trying to involve gravity at the quantum level. Many of those would be radically different than this one with factors in play beyond comprehension; and with the many-worlds universes, too, yet they could be all around us all the time. Any of the diverse ideas about quantum behavior are hard to grasp. Adding a whole other element are the increasing holographic and simulation resemblances. Holographic models have for decades been adapted into string theory, which has interpretations that go from subtly to greatly different. The holographic principle in general does have evidence and, depending on whom you ask, might surpass other theories. But no theory should be carved in stone while the carving edge is only what definition that’s within observational reach of our brain. New, unexpected findings are almost certain to keep coming; they always have and likely have barely budged yet.
.
Considering all that, could we think humanity is at the evolutionary pinnacle of awareness? There is only around a two percent difference in DNA coding between a human and a chimp to account for what seems like a stratospheric leap of intelligence–what would another two percent mean? Why out of so many pieces of data processed by
the subconscious every second does the surface mind use so little? The system’s answer would be that we use as much and are as aware as the natural order alone has decided for us. Infinity is likely to exist at both the micro and macro levels with any separation between the two being illusory; such grandeur is the last that would be used to describe the world today, but it should be.
.
No one knows exactly what consciousness is, but there is indication that it really is the immaterial pattern made by material but not the material itself; and we must remember that particles are not what they appear to be, either. The implied nature behind particles has some relationship, in terms of a representative of all possibility. It could be that consciousness and their true state of abstraction are closely connected. There are some numbers given above, but enormous as they may be, there could still be no number to attach to the infinite. Mathematics still generally denies there is such a thing as non-theoretical infinity, because the results of a calculation are likewise required to fit with an observation to go further. Mathematics is a phenomenal tool, though, and physics is where it is because of that. There would be little to nothing known about quantum behavior otherwise. The computer this was written on and the internet where it is posted would not exist. It is just unfortunate that the work of so many brilliant thinkers has been hijacked by the powers that be and used for their benefit first and foremost.
.
Amidst the observations of science and the explanations that strive to fit, it’s important to both learn from them and to step back at times with a perspective on what is an observation. The deeper nature of everything in this universe is pooled in the same unified field of some kind. It is just expressed in wildly different ways, from waveform to electrical activity to particles to vast accumulations. So that which is observing and that which is being observed are both, in a deep enough place, pooled together and indivisible. There the lines between physical and nonphysical are blurred to where there really are none. With strings at one frequency, you would get a certain type of particle; strings at a different frequency, get another type. In any instance at any given scale, frequencies and vibrations are precursors to and qualities of manifestation, and that is what first enables the ability to divide and rule. We get pushed to extremely
overidentify with a singular, manifested existence rather than the non-specific form of staggering potentials that underlie it. The hard three-dimensional environment we’re in can be quite convincing, but what the strict believers in appearance miss is that virtual realities would operate similarly to how this one does and produce the same effect. Ours is a spectrum from the abstract of possibility and raw data, to forces and emergence of recognizable gravity, all the way up to the perceived cosmos. Behind even the classical view of this reality, the expression of that which is physical and impermanent arises, and immerses back and forth, from that which can move and change but doesn’t begin or end. Even if being aware is seen as purely a production of physical mechanisms in the brain, it still traces back to the same place in conjunction.
.
In the presence of new discoveries, everything is still subject to change. In such realms described as all possibility, the key discovery should not be something that must be searched for outwardly. As for what the majority observes, the brain/mind is just wetware running software and consciousness is a confined byproduct with a brief shelf life. It is a very small minority who have ever had a near-death or clinically-dead out-of-body-experience, but if those numbers were switched, then that perspective would be the majority and someone who had not been there would be disregarded.
.
If everyone could see reality from the point of its deeper nature, they would realize that hurting one another is just the same as hurting themselves. With greater access to consciousness, there is a frequent realization about time. Time in which all past and future events are taking place right now, contrasted to a timeline with change as result of life and death and starts and stops; time with change as a course of perpetual transformation. There is time where seemingly divided beings, and their points of awareness, are instead temporary drops of vibration in the same ocean and had only appeared to have boundaries. What’s incredible is to finally get there and then realize you always were there and just didn’t know it. There comes a point of expansion that transitions from learning to simply letting go of the illusions that conceal what is already known.
.
In the movie of the everyday, to break through hardwired perception can be very difficult even when someone is fully aware of how it was done to them. It can persist in spite of every effort. What can make the task so daunting is that there are so few others trying to break through as well. It can be both liberating and disheartening at once and leaves many resigned to toil in obscurity. Their presence is vital even if the others are few and far between who’ve come to similar conclusions about the real agenda directing the world. The first crucial spark when somebody new begins to wake up can only come from within themselves, but it is far more likely to happen with more contributing presence to its cause. When one can truly break through, there is no real worry anymore because it is so monumentally clear that this experience is not the end-all, but just a flicker of something far bigger and more important. And to get beyond does not have to be a matter of waiting because all the possibilities of awareness are already there. One can relax and need not try to push at anyone else to wake up, only suggest the provocations and questions. The journey can quickly become vast into any set of details about how this world is run, but before the will to explore can move an inch, there has to arise the initial spark. A very important thing to remember, no matter what happens, is that fear is part of the program and the program is just a fiction.
Site Title 